Understanding the Invisible Hand: Insights from Peter Foster
Written on
Chapter 1: The Invisible Hand and Its Implications
Peter Foster's book, particularly Chapter 18, has sparked my interest by addressing questions that have long intrigued me. Why do we challenge the concept of the Invisible Hand? Why is there a lack of awareness regarding the catastrophic consequences of attempts to replace market systems, which have historically led to repression, violence, and widespread poverty? Foster has meticulously examined various disciplines—history, sociology, psychology, and anthropology—to shed light on these questions.
At the core, the issue lies in the contrast between our intricate modern economy, which often feels abstract, and the simpler lives our ancestors led in smaller communities with limited resources. The prevalent mindset of "zero-sum" economics shapes many people's instinctive reactions to economic matters. In pre-industrial times, resources could not be sustainably expanded, leading to a situation where one person's gain often meant another's loss.
Foster critiques this Malthusian perspective, a theme I have also explored in my previous writings. His analysis reveals how deeply ingrained this way of thinking is within our society. While Malthus's observations were valid in his time, Adam Smith's forward-looking perspective suggested an escape from this trap, primarily through technological advancements. Technology—beyond just computers—refers to our ability to transform inputs into outputs. Over generations, we have continuously expanded our resources and their productivity, resulting in significant improvements in our standard of living.
Despite these advancements, many believe we are on the verge of depletion and that the future appears bleaker than the past. The real danger arises when misguided policies are based on erroneous beliefs. Among our primitive economic instincts, the zero-sum mindset may be the most damaging to wealth and freedom.
Section 1.1: The Adam Smith Problem
For years, scholars have grappled with "the Adam Smith problem," which points to perceived contradictions between his earlier work, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, and his later piece, The Wealth of Nations. The former addresses the multitude of human motivations, while the latter focuses on how self-interest, guided by an invisible hand, ultimately benefits society.
Foster argues that the real issue isn't a change in Smith's views, but rather the dissonance between the complex nature of humanity described in his first book and the emerging capitalist framework outlined in the second. A nuanced reading of Smith reveals that he acknowledges different motivations in various contexts and does not suggest that self-interest is the sole driver of human behavior.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Complexity of Capitalism
The rapid evolution of capitalist society, while yielding remarkable material advantages, has also introduced unique challenges to our moral understanding. This environment has created opportunities for power-hungry individuals to exploit the resulting chaos. The desire for power, intertwined with morality, often operates unconsciously, adept at justifying itself.
Section 1.2: The Psychology of Taboo
Foster introduces the concept of the "psychology of taboo," as described by psychologist Philip Tetlock, which refers to the inclination to dismiss certain viewpoints as morally unacceptable and thus unworthy of consideration. Those advocating for free-market solutions must recognize that challenging top-down government approaches may not lead to constructive debates; instead, it often elicits hostility, as any critique is seen as an affront.
Central planners frequently view failures not as fundamental flaws in their strategies but as indications that more intense adjustments or innovations are required. The idea of inaction is morally unacceptable to them, leading to a cycle of misguided policies.
Chapter 2: The Role of Government in Economics
In the face of policy failures, planners might ask, "Are we to do nothing?" Often, the response is a resounding "Yes!"—but only regarding governmental intervention. The notion of "doing nothing" is perceived as irresponsible, yet in reality, it reflects a belief that government should refrain from intervening. Individuals facing genuine problems do not stand idly by; they seek solutions either independently or through collective efforts, without requiring top-down directives.
This brings us back to the concept of the Invisible Hand and the question of whether we can trust individuals to make better decisions than an authoritarian planner. Foster acknowledges that while government has a role, we must remember that government is composed of people who may also have their own motivations for power.
In essence, Foster emphasizes that capitalism is not a remedy for self-interest or poor judgment, both of which exist universally. Instead, the market effectively channels these impulses when supported by a functional state system. Capitalism necessitates property rights and legal frameworks to uphold contracts and penalize wrongdoing. It encourages honesty, prudence, and charity.
Ultimately, the relationship between the free market and government is not adversarial; they must work in concert. While the free market requires protective measures from the government, it does not need the government to control its operations.
Foster succinctly encapsulates this sentiment: those who wish to control the Invisible Hand must confront the reality that it is one of the most powerful and beneficial forces in human history. When we challenge it, it invariably retaliates.