Rethinking Race and Scientific Racism: An In-Depth Analysis
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Scientific Racism
In this ongoing series examining America's deep-rooted issues with racism, we delve into the contentious debates surrounding racial identity and its implications in today's society. The line separating genuine science from pseudoscience is often blurred, as evidenced in the context of taxonomy and race. In this segment, we will explore how emerging scientific classifications historically undermined the humanity of non-white populations. The illustration above depicts a whimsical representation of the double helix by Francis Crick, a pivotal figure in our understanding of DNA.
In 1583, the Italian doctor Andreas Cesalpino, often recognized as the first taxonomist, released his significant work, De Plantis, cataloging over 1,500 plant species. Taxonomy encompasses the classification of living organisms, elucidating their relationships, and assigning them universally recognized names in Latin, distinct from common vernacular. The fundamental unit of taxonomy is the species, which consists of organisms that can interbreed, such as horses, classified under Equus caballus.
Closely related species that exhibit notable traits are grouped within a genus. For instance, horses, wild asses, and zebras share the genus Equus, with horses specifically identified as caballus. Notably, within a species, certain groups may develop unique physical or behavioral traits—often due to geographical isolation—resulting in classifications as subspecies, identified by a third Latin name. For example, domesticated horses fall under Equus caballus caballus, while the wild horse is designated as Equus caballus przewalskii.
Some early taxonomists, influenced more by prevailing cultural beliefs than by scientific rigor, posited that individuals with distinct physical traits represented different subspecies of humanity. The term "race," rarely used prior to the 16th century, began to signify these variations. This notion opened the door to the idea that different races possessed varying capabilities, justifying differential treatment. Africans, for instance, were labeled as an inferior race, suited for slavery, a belief that was rationalized as beneficial for their well-being.
Ironically, the first law endorsing slavery emerged in 1641 in Massachusetts, a northern colony. Subsequently, other colonies enacted similar legislation, allowing for a lifetime of forced labor for newly arrived Africans. Initially, the status of enslaved individuals did not automatically extend to their offspring, but Virginia changed this in 1662, mandating that children inherit their mother's status, which allowed landowners to exploit female slaves without consequence. By 1700, around 25,000 enslaved individuals resided in the colonies, a number that surged to 100,000 in Virginia alone by 1750, culminating in four million enslaved people by the Civil War.
The Impact of Linnaeus
The field of taxonomy advanced significantly with the contributions of Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus (d. 1778), who introduced a standardized naming system for species. Linnaeus' system quickly gained prominence and remains in use today. Unfortunately, he perpetuated the belief that races were unequal in intelligence and potential.
At just 28 years old, Linnaeus published the first edition of Systema Naturae, detailing the species he deemed valid. Over his lifetime, he released twelve editions, each more comprehensive than the last. He identified four human subspecies, ranking them based on perceived advancements, with Europeans at the pinnacle and Sub-Saharan Africans at the base—reflecting the biases of his era. Remarkably, in the tenth edition published in 1758, Linnaeus elevated Native Americans above Europeans, possibly influenced by the ideal of the "Noble Savage."
Linnaeus categorized humans as follows:
- Homo sapiens americanus: characterized by a red complexion and a traditional lifestyle.
- Homo sapiens europaeus: depicted as cheerful, inventive, and religious.
- Homo sapiens asiaticus: described with melancholy traits and dark features.
- Homo sapiens africanus: portrayed as lazy and unambitious.
These classifications were often cited by proponents of slavery, who contended that their views were scientifically validated rather than merely prejudiced. They argued that slavery was advantageous for Africans, claiming it elevated their status.
In the next section, we will investigate the role of Native Americans within America's evolving racial framework, examining the treaties made and subsequently broken by English colonists and later Americans, driven by greed and a belief in white superiority.
Section 1.1: The Role of Taxonomy in Racial Classification
Section 1.2: The Historical Context of Racial Theories
Chapter 2: The Legacy of Linnaeus and Racial Ideologies
The first video, “We have never been racist”: Rethinking race and ethnicity in contemporary Greece, explores the complex relationship between race and identity in modern Greece, challenging historical narratives and present-day implications.
The second video, A Study in Medical and Scientific Racism In America, delves into the historical context of medical practices and scientific theories that have perpetuated racial discrimination, emphasizing the need for critical examination of these legacies.