When individuals assert that fusion represents a safe energy source, they imply an inherent safety. However, similar to steam, it poses risks if not managed properly. This article discusses the four elemental forces of nature, emphasizing the significance of careful handling—highlighting that human deception is the final elemental fire.

The 1800s witnessed the development of steam energy harnessed from chemical reactions, achieved through effective containment of fire’s energy to prevent disastrous outcomes. This principle of containment is fundamental to controlling fire, whether from matches or other chemical interactions commonly encountered in everyday life.

In contrast, extracting energy from fission, primarily using large atoms like uranium, is relatively straightforward. When sufficiently large atoms are combined, they can spontaneously enter a state of uncontrolled combustion. Just as a pile of coals ignites a fire, fission represents a different variant of combustion that arises from specific materials.

While it is possible to control the fission process by gradually introducing large atoms, this reaction occurs when they split into smaller atoms upon reaching a critical mass in a confined space. Thus, it becomes a matter of containment, akin to managing a coal fire or steam in a vessel.

Regrettably, many of the resultant smaller atoms possess high levels of long-lived radioactivity, creating a hazardous environment that requires additional containment measures. The process of splitting heavier atoms generates a toxic mix of radioactive byproducts. Currently, no economically viable and safe fission reactions exist for energy production. Unlike steam, we cannot simply dispose of fission byproducts. While it is possible to transform them into safer materials, this eventually becomes an unmanageable cycle due to the persistent challenge of heavy atoms and further fission reactions. The adverse consequences of fission cannot be perfectly contained.

Conversely, harnessing energy from fusion—where atoms merge to create different substances—presents another distinct form of combustion. However, initiating fusion demands extreme energy levels, even for small atoms. The fusion of hydrogen into helium is the simplest process, yet containment remains a significant hurdle.

The energy produced during fusion is so immense that no known material can contain its initiation or sustained reaction. Any container made from existing materials in the universe would be obliterated before achieving the necessary temperatures for fusion. Following initiation, all material is annihilated, preventing the harnessing of energy into steam. Moreover, if larger atoms are involved, the process can lead to fission, resulting in rapid contamination.

Thermonuclear bombs utilize fission detonators, which means their containment failure within microseconds poses no issue. Although these fission bombs generate hazardous byproducts, the fusion process also yields dangerous fission products from surrounding materials. While it is possible to engineer “cleaner” bombs that attempt to mitigate these effects, they remain inherently dirty.

The issue of containment is central to both fusion energy and explosive devices. If the containment challenge can be successfully addressed, fusion could serve as an ideal energy source, as it primarily generates helium from hydrogen and an enormous amount of useful energy.

The dilemma arises when attempting to contain energy that can only be controlled with additional energy, thus preventing an uncontrollable fusion fire. Stars resolve this issue through their massive gravitational forces, which sustain their fusion reactions. However, the presence of elements beyond hydrogen in stars indicates that they do not produce entirely clean energy. The notion of clean fusion in stars is a misconception, similar to the myth surrounding thermonuclear bombs.

Even stars grapple with containment issues that remain unresolved without substantial radioactive shielding and protective measures against their intense emissions, as well as against fission and high-temperature steam.

As we lack the means to dynamically control gravity, we rely on electromagnetic energy. In the 1800s, James Clerk Maxwell, whom Einstein regarded as the greatest mind of that era, demonstrated that electricity and magnetism are different manifestations of the same energy. Electromagnetic energy, while not material, represents a distinct force devoid of mass. Theoretically, we could contain fusion by isolating any matter except the specific hydrogen required for fusion to occur.

This non-material "electromagnetic energy" is indeed visible, as every atom in your body acts as an electromagnetic detector, allowing you to perceive various forms of electromagnetic energy, including light. Light itself is a pure manifestation of electromagnetic energy, capable of exerting force on matter, as evidenced by simple experiments with solar-powered devices.

By applying sufficient electromagnetic force to hydrogen, it can ignite into helium through fusion. If hydrogen is continuously supplied in a controlled manner, the fusion process can maintain a steady output of energy and helium.

Provided that no heavier materials are present and that excessive force does not lead to the formation of larger atoms, this process can serve as a sustainable and remarkably safe containment strategy for vast amounts of electromagnetic energy, often recognized as electricity or steam.

The crux of the matter lies in containment. This encapsulates the overarching narrative surrounding the management of three primary types of recognized fires in physics: chemical fires, fission fires, and fusion fires, along with their residual byproducts. Physicists refer to these high-energy states as "plasmas," where matter reaches extreme temperatures, resulting in varying degrees of atomic disintegration. The chemical manifestations of these plasmas can be observed in candle flames and felt as heat. Ultimately, successful containment is essential for harnessing the fires of creation in a controlled manner.

Albert Einstein's concise paper from 1905 laid the groundwork for understanding fission energy through the equation e = mc², proposing that this principle could be empirically validated through measurable energy loss in fissioning matter. He posited that energy could be transformed into mass and vice versa, illustrating how relativity governs reality through the concept of lightspeed containment.

As noted in his work, the equation indicates that the change in inertia from rest (mass) corresponds to energy (kinetic relative velocity) divided by the square of the speed of light. Einstein also predicted that the burning of heavy radium atoms could serve as a test case for this fission theory, given that the energy produced by chemical reactions was too minimal to measure with the lighting technology of his time.

<div class="link-block">

<div>

<div>

<h2>Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy-Content?</h2>

<div><h3>The results of the previous investigation lead to a very interesting conclusion, which is here to be deduced.</h3></div>

<div><p>www.fourmilab.ch</p></div>

</div>

<div>

</div>

</div>

</div>

James Clerk Maxwell's brief analysis from around 1860 elucidated that light consists of electromagnetic waves—electric and magnetic waves functioning as a unified transverse wave that can propagate indefinitely through space without the need for matter. This understanding explains why a beam of light can traverse billions of years from a distant sun to reach our eyes; it is fundamentally a containment issue, and Maxwell's insights guide us in addressing it.

<div class="link-block">

<div>

<div>

<h2>Who is James Clerk Maxwell?</h2>

<div><h3>Pretty Much The Father of Most of Humanity’s Physical Progress in the last 150 years and of our Practical Understanding…</h3></div>

<div><p>medium.com</p></div>

</div>

<div>

</div>

</div>

</div>

What energy density is required for hydrogen to fuse in the context of fusion fires? For those interested in more detailed figures, Wikipedia offers a comprehensive overview.

<div class="link-block">

<div>

<div>

<h2>Nuclear fusion - Wikipedia</h2>

<div><h3>Nuclear fusion is a reaction in which two or more atomic nuclei are combined to form one or more different atomic…</h3></div>

<div><p>en.wikipedia.org</p></div>

</div>

<div>

</div>

</div>

</div>

Hydrogen must reach temperatures exceeding 15 million degrees Kelvin for fusion into helium to occur, as found in the Sun's core, which corresponds to around 27 million degrees Fahrenheit.

In comparison, tungsten has the highest melting point of any common element, vaporizing just above 10,000 degrees Fahrenheit. No solid material exists that can withstand the extreme conditions required for fusion. The temperatures associated with solar fusion are 27,000 times greater than any material can endure, with hydrogen fusion at lower pressures reaching even higher temperatures—over 100,000 times hotter than tungsten's melting point.

However, the energy carried by photons within electromagnetic energy can indeed achieve these extreme temperatures and exert the necessary force to facilitate fusion.

To observe fusion fire in action, one can safely observe the sun’s hydrogen fusion through various DIY methods with readily available materials at home.

<div class="link-block">

<div>

<div>

<h2>Sun Scope</h2>

<div><h3>Group Viewing Spots, Shadows, and Eclipses Of the Sun</h3></div>

<div><p>medium.com</p></div>

</div>

<div>

</div>

</div>

</div>

At its core, the concept of containment is paramount, representing a reliable truth supported by scientific figures committed to accuracy in addressing practical containment challenges.

Moreover, contemporary research into language neuroscience has illuminated how animals with complex brains harness and utilize the vibrant electromagnetic knowledge encoded within their nervous systems.

Metazoan knowledge, like other forms of fire, has the potential to spiral out of control. Fortunately, we now possess the means to manage it effectively. Understanding the nature of this fire and the strategies for containing it is more accessible than ever.

<div class="link-block">

<div>

<div>

<h2>How Your Brain Computes</h2>

<div><h3>It’s Simple but Deceivingly Clever</h3></div>

<div><p>medium.com</p></div>

</div>

<div>

</div>

</div>

</div>

The essence of human deception can be likened to fusion, where lies emerge from the depths of observable truths. These lies can be as destructive as fusion energy, potentially threatening our survival. Nevertheless, specific types of energy can effectively contain the fusion of these lies among individuals. This principle is both scientifically grounded and historically validated, although further work is needed to manage the potentially explosive nature of human deception.

Failure to contain the unique fire of human lies could lead to catastrophic consequences for life on Earth, a reality we have witnessed recently. Now is the time to grasp the significance of these observations, empowered by scientific understanding.