Composite Integers and Number Theory: IMO 2023 Problem 1 Explained
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to IMO 2023 Problem 1
In the recent International Mathematical Olympiad held in Chiba, Japan, the competition showcased its first problem focusing on number theory. This year, the team from China claimed the top position, with the USA and South Korea following suit.
This article dives into the details of Problem 1, which is typically the most straightforward among the six challenges presented. However, being part of the IMO, it's essential to recognize that it's still a significant challenge unless one is well-prepared.
Video Explanation
To aid in understanding, here’s a helpful video that walks through solving the IMO 2023 Problem 1.
Section 1.1: The Problem Statement
The task is to identify all composite integers ( n > 1 ) that fulfill the following condition: if ( d(1), d(2), ldots, d(k) ) are the positive divisors of ( n ) arranged in ascending order, then ( d(i) ) must divide ( d(i+1) + d(i+2) ) for every ( 1 leq i leq k - 2 ).
To illustrate, let’s consider ( n = 12 ). The divisors are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12. Here, we see that ( 1 ) divides ( (2 + 3) ), but ( 2 ) does not divide ( (3 + 4) ). Therefore, ( n = 12 ) does not meet the condition.
Now, examining ( n = 25 ): the divisors are 1, 5, and 25. Clearly, ( 1 ) divides ( (5 + 25) ), and since there are no further divisors, ( n = 25 ) satisfies the condition. This can be generalized to numbers that have exactly three divisors, specifically numbers in the form ( n = p^2 ), where ( p ) is a prime.
Section 1.2: Expanding the Search
Continuing our exploration, let’s consider ( n = 16 ):
The divisors are 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. Here, we find:
- ( 1 ) divides ( (2 + 4) )
- ( 2 ) divides ( (4 + 8) )
- ( 4 ) divides ( (8 + 16) )
So indeed, it satisfies the condition. Hence, numbers of the form ( n = p^k ) where ( p ) is prime and ( k ) is a positive integer are valid.
Chapter 2: Investigating Composite Integers
Now, let’s examine more complex composite integers. For instance, consider ( n = 35 ):
The divisors here are 1, 5, 7, and 35. We find that:
- ( 1 ) divides ( (5 + 7) )
- However, ( 5 ) does not divide ( (7 + 35) )
Thus, ( n = 35 ) does not meet the criteria, and similarly, any composite number with two distinct prime factors will likely fail the test.
The conclusion seems to emerge that composite numbers of the form ( n = p^k ) are the only candidates. However, we must also consider numbers with multiple distinct prime factors, such as ( n = 330 ) or ( n = 72 ).
In the case of ( n = 330 ):
The divisors are extensive, and checking them reveals inconsistencies:
- ( 1 ) divides ( (2 + 3) )
- ( 2 ) divides ( (3 + 5) )
- Yet, ( 3 ) does not divide ( (5 + 6) )
This reasoning can be applied broadly to other composite integers with a similar structure.
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, we derive the insight that a number ( n ) satisfies the stated condition if and only if it is of the form ( n = p^k ), where ( p ) is prime.
To further solidify this understanding, here’s another insightful video that provides a more sophisticated proof of the result.
This exploration showcases how problem-solving in mathematics often involves recognizing patterns, utilizing examples, and generalizing findings to arrive at a comprehensive understanding.
